Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Chief  has accused the United States, Britain and Pakistan of having links with the militants responsible for a suicide bombing. The evidence is pointing to the credibility of their claim in an attack that killed five senior guard commanders and 37 others.

Press TV reported that:

American and NATO bases around Iran in the Middle East

“According to a 2007 Sunday Telegraph report, the group was originally created by the CIA to achieve ‘regime change in Iran’. The report said the US intelligence agency sought to destabilize Iran by ’supplying arms-length support’ and ‘money and weapons’ to Jundallah.”

“Another report posted by ABC also revealed that US officials had ordered the group to ’stage deadly guerrilla raids inside the Islamic Republic, kidnap Iranian officials and execute them on camera’, all as part of a ‘programmatic objective to overthrow the Iranian government’”

There is no question that the warmongers are hard at work in Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Let’s pose a question here: who really and truly benefits from suicide bombings and turmoil in Iran?

A country that has not seen military conflicts for a long time since the creation of regional instability around it.

So, it is safe to say that Iran has been one of the most stable countries in the middle east as far as external confrontation with  neighbors and internal suicide bombing are concerned.

Could it be Iran as a whole that would benefit from such a plot? It is not possible since the not only internal but also regional stability is quite vital to the Iranian government.

One can be sure that the Iranian people are not favoring this, even though some may oppose their government.

Would it benefit the Afghanies and the Pakistanis? Is it their governments? Is it the “Terrorists”?

Who would politically, militarily and strategically benefit from disturbance in Iran?

For some the answer is quite clear: the warmongers, the oil mafias, the elite in power and the ones that want to justify their presence in the region.

The countries and political powers that have, for over 500 years, insisted on their present in the middle east and have achieved many of their objectives through their main foreign policy strategy:

“Divide and you shall conquer”

To support this there has been many instances in the recent history that can be refered to:

• The capture of two british soldiers carry explosives and dressed as Arabs in Iraq in 2005

• The Shia and Sunni conflict a new phenomenon that has only come to life after the invation of Iraq.
• The creation and support for the Mujaheddin against the Russians by the American government.

• Over $400 million yearly budget passed by the American congress to for “project Iran”

• Absolute and unequivocal support of the western governments behind Saddam Hussies aggression against Iran

But how quickly we forget.

Related posts:

1. Iran vs Israel: Who Is Right?
2. Why Walking out on Ahmadinejad’s Speech is Not Justified
3. 10 Reasons Why Iran’s Nuclear Program is Hyped…
4. Drum Beats of War Running High with Iran’s Enrichment at Lower Rate
5. Ahmadinejad Arrives in New York for the 64th UN General Assembly